Welcome to the resource topic for 2020/1504
Title:
The Age of Testifying Wearable Devices: The Case of Intoxication Detection
Authors: Ben Nassi, Lior Rokach, Yuval Elovici
Abstract:Seven years ago, a famous case in which data from a Fitbit tracker was used in the courtroom in a personal injury case heralded a new age: the age of testifying wearable devices. Prior to that, data from wearable devices was used in various areas, including medicine, advertising, and scientific research, but the use of such data in the Fitbit case attracted the interest of a new sector: the legal sector. Since then, lawyers, investigators, detectives, and police officers have used data from pacemakers and smartwatches in order to prove/disprove allegations regarding wearable device owners in several well-known cases (sexual assault, arson, personal injury, etc.). In this paper, we discuss testifying wearable devices. We explain the advantages of wearable devices over traditional IoT devices in the legal setting, the parties involved in cases in which a wearable device was used to testify against/for the device owner, and the information flow. We then focus on an interesting area of research: intoxication detection. We explain the motivation to detect whether a subject was intoxicated and explain the primary scientific gap in this area. In order to overcome this gap, we suggest a new method for detecting whether a subject was intoxicated based on free gait data obtained from a wearable device. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method in a user study involving 30 subjects and show that motion sensor data obtained from a smartphone and fitness tracker from eight seconds of free gait can indicate whether a subject is/was intoxicated (obtaining an AUC of 0.97) and thus be used as testimony. Finally, we analyze the current state and the near future of the age of testifying wearable devices and explain why we believe that (1) we are still at the beginning of this age despite the fact that seven years has passed since the original court case, and (2) the number of cases in which wearable device data is used to testify for/against the device owner is expected to increase significantly in the next few years.
ePrint: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1504
See all topics related to this paper.
Feel free to post resources that are related to this paper below.
Example resources include: implementations, explanation materials, talks, slides, links to previous discussions on other websites.
For more information, see the rules for Resource Topics .