Welcome to the resource topic for 2016/196
Title:
Multi-Key FHE from LWE, Revisited
Authors: Chris Peikert, Sina Shiehian
Abstract:Traditional fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) schemes only allow computation on data encrypted under a \emph{single} key. Löpez-Alt, Tromer, and Vaikuntanathan (STOC 2012) proposed the notion of \emph{multi-key} FHE, which allows homomorphic computation on ciphertexts encrypted under different keys, and also gave a construction based on a (somewhat nonstandard) assumption related to NTRU.@ More recently, Clear and McGoldrick (CRYPTO 2015), followed by Mukherjee and Wichs (EUROCRYPT 2016), proposed a multi-key FHE that builds upon the LWE-based FHE of Gentry, Sahai, and Waters (CRYPTO 2013). However, unlike the original construction of Löpez-Alt \etal, these later LWE-based schemes have the somewhat undesirable property of being single-hop for keys:'' all relevant keys must be known at the start of the homomorphic computation, and the output cannot be usefully combined with ciphertexts encrypted under other keys (unless an expensive bootstrapping’’ step is performed). In this work we construct two multi-key FHE schemes, based on LWE assumptions, which are \emph{multi-hop for keys}: the output of a homomorphic computation on ciphertexts encrypted under a set of keys can be used in further homomorphic computation involving \emph{additional} keys, and so on. Moreover, incorporating ciphertexts associated with new keys is a relatively efficient ``native’’ operation akin to homomorphic multiplication, and does not require bootstrapping (in contrast with all other LWE-based solutions). Our systems also have smaller ciphertexts than the previous LWE-based ones; in fact, ciphertexts in our second construction are simply GSW ciphertexts with no auxiliary data.
ePrint: https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/196
See all topics related to this paper.
Feel free to post resources that are related to this paper below.
Example resources include: implementations, explanation materials, talks, slides, links to previous discussions on other websites.
For more information, see the rules for Resource Topics .