Welcome to the resource topic for 2014/484
Title:
Sealing the Leak on Classical NTRU Signatures
Authors: Carlos Aguilar Melchor, Xavier Boyen, Jean-Christophe Deneuville, Philippe Gaborit
Abstract:Initial attempts to obtain lattice based signatures were closely related to reducing a vector modulo the fundamental parallelepiped of a secret basis (like GGH \cite{GGH97}, or \texttt{NTRUSign} \cite{HHPSW02}). This approach leaked some information on the secret, namely the shape of the parallelepiped, which has been exploited on practical attacks \cite{NR06}. \texttt{NTRUSign} was an extremely efficient scheme, and thus there has been a noticeable interest on developing countermeasures to the attacks, but with little success \cite{DN12}. In \cite{GPV08} Gentry, Peikert and Vaikuntanathan proposed a randomized version of Babai’s nearest plane algorithm such that the distribution of a reduced vector modulo a secret parallelepiped only depended on the size of the base used. Using this algorithm and generating large, close to uniform, public keys they managed to get provably secure GGH-like lattice-based signatures. Recently, Stehlé and Steinfeld obtained a provably secure scheme very close to \texttt{NTRUSign} \cite{SS13} (from a theoretical point of view). In this paper we present an alternative approach to seal the leak of \texttt{NTRUSign}. Instead of modifying the lattices and algorithms used, we do a classic leaky \texttt{NTRUSign} signature and hide it with gaussian noise using techniques present in Lyubashevky’s signatures. Our main contributions are thus a set of strong \texttt{NTRUSign} parameters, obtained by taking into account latest known attacks against the scheme, a statistical way to hide the leaky \texttt{NTRU} signature so that this particular instantiation of CVP-based signature scheme becomes zero-knowledge and secure against forgeries, based on the worst-case hardness of the \mathcal{\tilde{O}}(N^{1.5})-Shortest Independent Vector Problem over \texttt{NTRU} lattices. Finally, we give a set of concrete parameters to gauge the efficiency of the obtained signature scheme.
ePrint: https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/484
See all topics related to this paper.
Feel free to post resources that are related to this paper below.
Example resources include: implementations, explanation materials, talks, slides, links to previous discussions on other websites.
For more information, see the rules for Resource Topics .